Geoff Caplan
2012-03-07 09:32:14 UTC
Hi folks
Thinking of moving from mod_php to a lighter-weight option like Hiawatha
or Nginx, but googling the issue of opcode caching with fastcgi is
proving surprisingly confusing: there's a lot of conflicting information
out there.
My basic question is this: what is the most performant,
memory-efficient, Slashdot-resistant way to set up PHP-FPM for a complex
PHP app that runs a lot of code?
More specifically:
1) Why cache? I understood that a fastcgi process compiles the app into
memory, and serves it from there till it's recycled after max_requests.
So what's the value of opcode caching? To speed up one request in 500?
But I've seen benchmarks that claim an opcode cache with fastcgi offers
50% savings on memory and response time. Where would these savings be
coming from? No one explains...
2) What cache? For example Nginx/PHP setup tutorials either omit opcode
caching or recommend xcache, without explaining why. There's a lot of
conflicting information about whether each process needs its own cache
(very memory intensive?) or whether processes can share a cache. Some
bloggers claim that Xcache handles this better than APC, but again, no
one explains how or why. Can anyone offer an authoritative answer to this?
So is opcode caching effective with fastcgi? If so, how does it work,
and what is the best setup? I would be more than grateful if anyone can
make sense of this.
Thinking of moving from mod_php to a lighter-weight option like Hiawatha
or Nginx, but googling the issue of opcode caching with fastcgi is
proving surprisingly confusing: there's a lot of conflicting information
out there.
My basic question is this: what is the most performant,
memory-efficient, Slashdot-resistant way to set up PHP-FPM for a complex
PHP app that runs a lot of code?
More specifically:
1) Why cache? I understood that a fastcgi process compiles the app into
memory, and serves it from there till it's recycled after max_requests.
So what's the value of opcode caching? To speed up one request in 500?
But I've seen benchmarks that claim an opcode cache with fastcgi offers
50% savings on memory and response time. Where would these savings be
coming from? No one explains...
2) What cache? For example Nginx/PHP setup tutorials either omit opcode
caching or recommend xcache, without explaining why. There's a lot of
conflicting information about whether each process needs its own cache
(very memory intensive?) or whether processes can share a cache. Some
bloggers claim that Xcache handles this better than APC, but again, no
one explains how or why. Can anyone offer an authoritative answer to this?
So is opcode caching effective with fastcgi? If so, how does it work,
and what is the best setup? I would be more than grateful if anyone can
make sense of this.